Intergovernmental Grants: A Formal Model of Interrelated National and Subnational Political Decisions
نویسنده
چکیده
Intergovernmental grants are based on the interrelated choices of: (i) the national government deciding whether to offer the grant; (ii) the national government determining grant conditions; (iii) the subnational government deciding whether to accept the grant; and (iv) the subnational government determining policy, including spending levels, upon grant receipt. Empirically and theoretically, scholars often study these decisions separately, leading to an incomplete understanding of grant-related behavior. This article develops a noncooperative game theoretic model that simultaneously captures all four of these decisions. This approach helps to better explain puzzles surrounding intergovernmental grants, including the ‘flypaper effect,’ asymmetric responses of recipient governments to grant increases and decreases, the grant-acceptance decisions of subnational governments, and tradeoffs between the size of grants and the strings that are attached.
منابع مشابه
Decentralization and Intergovernmental Relations In Social Policy: A Comparative Perspective of Brazil, Mexico and the US
Federalist systems are considered centralized when the national government has greater weight in the formation and implementation of public policy and in decisions concerning resource allocation than subnational governments. In a decentralized federal system, subnational governments have some degree of autonomy or discretion in these two arenas. Even though national and subnational governments ...
متن کاملFiscal federalism and decentralization in India
This paper surveys the state of fiscal federalism in India, in the broader context of decentralization. We begin with an overview of the basic features and recent developments in intergovernmental fiscal relations, including the role of political institutions, the specifics of legislative and budgetary autonomy, assignments of expenditure responsibility and revenue authority, revenue collection...
متن کاملContextualizing Obesity and Diabetes Policy: Exploring a Nested Statistical and Constructivist Approach at the Cross-National and Subnational Government Level in the United States and Brazil
Background This article conducts a comparative national and subnational government analysis of the political, economic, and ideational constructivist contextual factors facilitating the adoption of obesity and diabetes policy. Methods We adopt a nested analytical approach to policy analysis, which combines cross-national statistical analysis with subnational case study comparisons to examine...
متن کاملبررسی انواع کمکهای بودجهای دولت به شهرداریها (دولتهای محلی) در ایران
Central governments finance local government's expenditures in different ways. These different ways of financing emerge different types of intergovernmental grants that have special effect discussed in the literature. Non Earmarked grants, Earmarked grants, matching and none matching grants are some kinds of these grants. Central governments commonly have used these kinds of grants to access ...
متن کاملFiscal Federalism in Australia: Equity~fficiency Versus Public Choice Approaches in Explaining Intergovernmental Grants
Intergovernmental grants have been conventionally explained on the basis of either equity/efficiency and/or institutional considerations. As a result empirical approaches to grants have usually examined the impact of these transfers on recipient government expenditures, rather than evaluated the impact on the donor government and/or its political agents. The alternative public choice approach a...
متن کامل